Review Session Critiques
During the review session, we received very helpful critiques for future iterations of our exhibit concept and prototype. Some of the responses heard during the review session include:
These are all excellent as potential extensions of our project, and they serve as very useful suggestions if this exhibit concept is to reach further development stages.
What We Learned
From our progress throughout this course, we have gained several important lessons regarding our project and the overall experience. People tend to enjoy role-playing, but it is also important for stories to be relatable in order to most effectively promote learning. Our activity helped all groups learn more about confirmation bias, and visitors all agreed that they knew more about the concept after going through our activities. Finally, as a lesson to any future design or prototyping experience, we found that small changes in protocol can greatly affect visitor experience.
Moving Forward
There are many areas of our project that could be better refined. Some of these areas were limitations by the class structure (for example, a 6-week mini instead of a full-semester course), but some of these are also specific to our final exhibit concept and prototype. Moving forward, our specific aspirations would be to:
Given these areas of potential improvement, we still strongly support and recommend our exhibit concept and design to the Carnegie Museum of Natural History. For further documentation about our project, feel free to contact any of the students involved, or check out our blog at https://medium.com/bias-and-the-anthropocene.
Thank you to Professor Louw, Teaching Assistant Yiran Buckley, and all guest speakers and CMNH staff who helped make this project possible
Content Rating
Is this a good/useful/informative piece of content to include in the project? Have your say!
You must login before you can post a comment. .