A cartographic analysis seems like the appropriate representation for an understanding of context and distances. The biggest reason for this was that the entire presumption of biking for commute is the preference to bike longer distances. It is understood that the bike networks are not distances but displacement values of bike pick-ups and drop offs. Hence all 0 mile distances have been understood to be  loops and clearly don't show. However, the travel networks are surprising in that they show preference for travel over much longer distances than would be expected. Given that the average travel duration 1.03 hours, these results are encouraging. The map itself is a three layered analysis where darker shades show longer distances and vice versa.