Restoring and reviving the Shaker device changed my understanding of its value. Initially, I saw it as a simple tool for tactile communication, but working on the project showed me how complex and nuanced interactive technologies can be, especially when combining classic ideas with modern components.

What Worked:

• The solenoid performed well for tactile feedback, offering responsive and adjustable vibrations when triggered.

What Didn’t Work:

• The ball tilt sensor posed challenges in calibration and responsiveness, requiring multiple iterations to match the intended interaction.

• Fine-tuning the sensor’s sensitivity for precise, proportional feedback was more difficult than expected.

Lessons Learned:

• User testing and careful sensor calibration are essential for achieving the desired tactile experience.

• The challenge of integrating subtle feedback into an interactive device highlighted the importance of iterative development.

What I Would Do Differently:

• Focus more on ergonomics and usability from the start to ensure comfort.

• Calibrate the ball tilt sensor earlier to refine responsiveness.

Value of Revisiting Older Works:

Looking back at the Shaker helped me blend historical concepts with modern technology, inspiring fresh design directions. Revisiting older works reveals overlooked solutions, providing new insights for today’s needs, especially in creating meaningful tactile interactions.