Nice job, these two audios are really different. I agree with you that the second one is distorted even though it gets rid of the noise of breathing, but in the same time, it picks up some background noise too. Even though the first one has reading noise like breathing, I am more focused on what you are reading than in the second one.Since In the second one, the foreground sound is not loud enough and there are more background sounds, which make it distracting.
+0
Naomi Sternstein
Posted on 2014-11-13 07:55:47 -0500.
I agree with Dan, that the first recording really draws you in to the content of what you are reading because the voice seems much more inviting and dynamic. For a close recording, the sound is surprisingly clear and distinct. The farther recording is less clear and picks up on the echo of the voice more than the voice itself. It was nice to be able to hear such a distinct difference between the too.
Nice job, these two audios are really different. I agree with you that the second one is distorted even though it gets rid of the noise of breathing, but in the same time, it picks up some background noise too. Even though the first one has reading noise like breathing, I am more focused on what you are reading than in the second one.Since In the second one, the foreground sound is not loud enough and there are more background sounds, which make it distracting.
I agree with Dan, that the first recording really draws you in to the content of what you are reading because the voice seems much more inviting and dynamic. For a close recording, the sound is surprisingly clear and distinct. The farther recording is less clear and picks up on the echo of the voice more than the voice itself. It was nice to be able to hear such a distinct difference between the too.
You must login before you can post a comment. .