Francisco Rojo
Posted on 2014-11-12 22:40:51 -0500.
It is very evident in the second recording that other noise is being picked up. I think it was clever to turn up the gain so that the speaker's vocals could be heard more clearly, but I guess that also made the extra noise more audible.
+0
Amal Sahay
Posted on 2014-11-13 01:09:04 -0500.
You're right to bring up the movement of the speaker's lips and the sort of "sub-vocalization" (if that's a word) that comes with speaking in the near recording. I think your two readings are a perfect example of the difference between inside and outside the critical distance!
It is very evident in the second recording that other noise is being picked up. I think it was clever to turn up the gain so that the speaker's vocals could be heard more clearly, but I guess that also made the extra noise more audible.
You're right to bring up the movement of the speaker's lips and the sort of "sub-vocalization" (if that's a word) that comes with speaking in the near recording. I think your two readings are a perfect example of the difference between inside and outside the critical distance!
You must login before you can post a comment. .