Tonya Sedgwick
Posted on 2014-11-12 20:35:21 -0500.
The farther recording is much better. The first one is so loud and forced-sounding (probably from the clipping and over-emphasized stop-plosives) that it feels like the speaker is mad or yelling the words. The farther one sounds good, though.
+0
Eunice Oh
Posted on 2014-11-12 20:50:34 -0500.
The first recording was very loud and when the speaker pronounced the letter "s" in some of her words, it was very harsh to the ears. The second recording was better with reducing these sounds as she was further away from the microphone, and I could feel that she was at a distance in comparison to the first one.
+0
Mauricio Cano
Posted on 2014-11-12 21:39:57 -0500.
Fricatives and stops in the first recording end up sounding so much louder than they ought to, probably from being so close to her mouth. The second recording is a lot more pleasant to the ears.
The farther recording is much better. The first one is so loud and forced-sounding (probably from the clipping and over-emphasized stop-plosives) that it feels like the speaker is mad or yelling the words. The farther one sounds good, though.
The first recording was very loud and when the speaker pronounced the letter "s" in some of her words, it was very harsh to the ears. The second recording was better with reducing these sounds as she was further away from the microphone, and I could feel that she was at a distance in comparison to the first one.
Fricatives and stops in the first recording end up sounding so much louder than they ought to, probably from being so close to her mouth. The second recording is a lot more pleasant to the ears.
You must login before you can post a comment. .